The structural logic behind corruption

When discussing corruption, a lot of people from less corrupt systems talk about blatantly corrupt systems and you can hear a condescending undercurrent of: “These amoral corrupt people…” in their assessment of the situation. As if it was always the decision of this one corrupt individual to take or give bribes. And, understanding where they come from, in a less corrupt system, that might be broadly true.

My friends in northern Ghana though agreed that a road contractor who wasn’t prepared to pay his 10% to everyone involved would not get any jobs and so, by definition, not be a road contractor. They didn’t judge this as an un-ethical act but, ironically, saw the contractor who distributed part of the contract sum as following the (informal) rules.

When network mapping with a group of people involved in avian flu prevention, we talked about the question: Where in this network do people have the highest incentive to bribe? This helped us to understand that it is not the evil character of cross-border chicken traders but rather the lack of compensation for dead birds and the position of control of the border officials, that makes the cross-border trade a potential corruption hot-spot.

Regina Birner has used Net-Map to visualize and summarize her findings about corruption in the construction of small reservoirs in Ghana and in forestry in Indonesia. We had an interesting discussion this week about how you could use Net-Map as a tool to diagnose potential structural corruption hot-spots without focusing on exposing individuals and thus improve the design of programs and organizations to reduce incentives for corruption. Have a look at her case study.

Can you think of examples that you have experienced or heard about where certain structures invited corruption? What exactly could be the switches to turn for reducing the incentives for corruption in these cases?

4 Responses

  1. Hi Eva,
    here is my 2 cents: in my project there was a long and fierce debate on whether to use Free and Open Source software (Linux & OpenOffice) in the computer labs I’m about to put in place in Burundian schools. When asked for his opinion, an experienced computer consultant answered that beyond techincal reasons, Burundian ministries are recalcitrants to adopt Free and Open Source software precisely because, being freely downloadable from the Net, the 10% of nothing is nothing, thus better pay some thousands dollars for Microsoft products and have a real, juicy 10% instead.
    …and now I go wire you 0.2 cents via Western Union to have this comment published.😉

  2. […] every project I do I learn something new, about corruption in Ghana or rice par-boiling in northern Nigeria. I work with content matter experts who can explain these […]

  3. What are some ways to help the members of a group go beyond their individual perspectives and sense the whole?…

    Net-Map is a network mapping method that allows people (for any given complex situation) to understand: Who is involved? How are they linked (formal and informal links)? How influential are they? What are their goals? What does this all mean? When doin…

  4. Which are the anti-corruption tools a humanitarian worker has to know?…

    For me the most important thing you have to understand about corruption is that most of the times it is the system and not the amoral individual that leads to corruption. I sometimes joke that there are corrupt chairs in some systems. Whoever sits down…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: